David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):301-312 (1984)
There is a common view in medical ethics that the patient's right to be informed entails, as well, a correlative right not to be informed, i.e., to waive one's right to information. This paper argues, from a consideration of the concept of autonomy as the foundation for rights, that there can be no such ‘right’ to refuse relevant information, and that the claims for such a right are inconsistent with both deontological and utilitarian ethics. Further, the right to be informed is shown to be a mandatory right (though not a welfare right); persons are thus seen to have both a right and a duty to be informed. Finally, the consequences of this view are addressed: since the way in which we conceptualize our problems tends to determine the actions we take to resolve them, it is important properly to conceptualize patients' requests not to be informed. There may be many reasons for acting in accord with such a request, but it is a mistake to conceptualize one's act as ‘respecting a right possessed by persons’. Keywords: medical ethics, informed consent, autonomy, information-waivers, rights, obligations CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, John M. Conley, Arlene M. Davis, Marcia Van Riper, Rebecca L. Walker & Eric T. Juengst (2015). Looking for Trouble: Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population and the Role of Patient Choice. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):3-14.
Vilhjálmur Árnason (2011). Database Research: Public and Private Interests. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):563-571.
Valerie J. Grant (1996). Informed Consent for Clinical Treatment: A Psychologist Speaks for Patients. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 4 (1):76-79.
Niels Nijsingh (2016). Consent to Epistemic Interventions: A Contribution to the Debate on the Right to Know. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):103-110.
Niklas Juth (2014). The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):38-52.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Wear & Jonathan D. Moreno (1994). Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence Within Clinical Medicine. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 6 (5):323-325.
Tom Walker (2013). Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information. Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
James Wilson (2007). Is Respect for Autonomy Defensible? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):353-356.
N. Stoljar (2011). Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):375-384.
Jukka Varelius (2012). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Gary B. Weiss (1984). Patient Truthfulness: A Test of Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):353-372.
Mark Strasser (1986). Mill and the Right to Remain Uninformed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (3):265-278.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads20 ( #197,288 of 1,934,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?