David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 45 (2):204–228 (2006)
Leon Goldstein’s critical philosophy of history has suffered a relative lack of attention, but it is the outcome of an unusual story. He reached conclusions about the autonomy of the discipline of history similar to those of R. G. Collingwood and Michael Oakeshott, but he did so from within the Anglo-American analytic style of philosophy that had little tradition of discussing such matters. Initially, Goldstein attempted to apply a positivistic epistemology derived from Hempel’s philosophy of natural science to historical knowledge, but gradually formulated an anti-realistic epistemology that firmly distinguished historical knowledge of the past not only from the scientific perspective but also from fictional and common-sense attitudes to the past. Among his achievements were theories of the distinctive nature of historical evidence and historical propositions, of the constructed character of historical events, and of the relationship between historical research and contemporary culture. Taken together, his ideas merit inclusion among the most important twentieth-century contributions to the problem of historical knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ernest Nagel (1960). Determinism in History. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (3):291-317.
Leon J. Goldstein (1962). Evidence and Events in History. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):175-194.
Leon J. Goldstein (1956). The Inadequacy of the Principle of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Philosophy 53 (25):801-813.
Leon J. Goldstein (1967). Theory in History. Philosophy of Science 34 (1):23-40.
Arthur C. Danto (1956). On Explanations in History. Philosophy of Science 23 (1):15-30.
Citations of this work BETA
D. L. D'Avray & Antonia Fitzpatrick (2013). Formalizing the Logic of Historical Inference: Contact Details. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 78 (4):833-844.
Similar books and articles
Leon J. Goldstein (1973). Cognitive Development and Epistemology. Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 5:229-232.
Leon J. Goldstein (1987). Expression of Historical Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):77-78.
Leon J. Goldstein (1972). Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. Philosophia 2 (3):261-264.
Leon J. Goldstein (1958). A Note on the Status of Historical Reconstructions. Journal of Philosophy 55 (11):473-479.
Leon J. Goldstein (1986). The Way to Historical Being and Time. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (1):101-105.
Leon J. Goldstein (1975). A Note on Historical Interpretation. Philosophy of Science 42 (3):312-319.
Leon J. Goldstein (1980). Against Historical Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (3):426-429.
Leon J. Goldstein (1991). Historical Being. The Monist 74 (2):206-216.
P. H. Nowell-Smith (1977). Book Reviews : Historical Knowing. By Leon Goldstein. Austin & London: The University of Texas Press, 1975. Pp. XXVII + 242: First Review. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (3):315-316.
Leon J. Goldstein (1973). On Historical and Political Knowing. Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 5:232-233.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #466,308 of 1,907,057 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,104 of 1,907,057 )
How can I increase my downloads?