David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 22 (1):41-58 (2009)
A critical examination of Parfit's attempt to reconcile Kantian contractualism with consequentialism, which disputes his contention that the contracting parties would lack decisive reasons to choose principles that ground prohibitions against harming of the sort to which non-consequentialists have been attracted. 1.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Woodard (2013). The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act-Utilitarianism. Utilitas 25 (2):246-265.
Similar books and articles
Tim Mulgan (2001). The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.
Jane Singleton (2002). Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:537-551.
Jacob Ross (2009). Should Kantians Be Consequentialists? Ratio 22 (1):126-135.
Dale Dorsey (2012). Consequentialism, Metaphysical Realism and the Argument From Cluelessness. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):48-70.
David Cummiskey (1990). Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
Douglas W. Portmore (2011). Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford Univ Pr.
Bart Streumer (2003). Can Consequentialism Cover Everything? Utilitas 15 (2):237-47.
Douglas W. Portmore (2011). 7 Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. 143.
Seiriol Morgan (2009). Can There Be a Kantian Consequentialism? Ratio 22 (1):19-40.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads96 ( #11,929 of 1,101,118 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #44,290 of 1,101,118 )
How can I increase my downloads?