John Earman, ed., Testing Scientific Theories Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 5 (4):161-163 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testing Scientific Theories.John Earman (ed.) - 1983 - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
A Modest Proposal. [REVIEW]Elliott Sober - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):487-494.
John Earman, Bayes or Bust? Reviewed by.Patrick Maher - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (4):151-153.
The epistemology of evidence in cognitive neuroscience.William P. Bechtel - forthcoming - In R. Skipper Jr, C. Allen, R. A. Ankeny, C. F. Craver, L. Darden, G. Mikkelson & and R. Richardson (eds.), Philosophy and the Life Sciences: A Reader. MIT Press.
Bayesianism With A Human Face.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1983 - In John Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 133--156.
``Bayesianism with a Human Face".Richard Jeffrey - 1984 - In John Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 133-156.
Remarks on Relational Theories of Motion.John Earman - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):83 - 87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Otte
University of California, Santa Cruz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references