Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (3) (2008)
|Abstract||The aim of this study was to explore stakeholder perceptions of the contribution of an Automatic Milking System (AMS) to sustainable development of organic dairy production in Denmark and the Netherlands. In addition, reasons for the current difference in AMS use on organic dairy farms between both countries were explored. To answer above mentioned aims, farmers and advisors in both countries were interviewed using a focus group approach. Questions of the interviews were based on a literature review on sustainability issues affected by introduction of AMS. Participants expressed no moral problems regarding AMS use. They, however, pointed out uncertainty about the economic gain, difficulties with grazing, adaptation problems to technology, and image problems towards consumers. The latter results from a reduction in grazing time affecting both animal welfare and product quality. The participants did not recognize eutrophication, as result of high stocking density on farmstead lots, as a problem caused by AMS. The milk quality problem related to AMS use, although acknowledged as crucial towards consumers, was not prioritized very highly, especially not by the farmers in both countries. All groups were, however, unanimous in their perception of how important image was as far as the consumers are concerned. The perception analysis revealed that Dutch participants were more concerned about the economic payoff of AMS use, and showed more reluctance towards enlargement than Danish ones. In addition, they acknowledged the small-scale naturalness of organic production. These differences in perception could possibly explain observed differences in AMS use in organic dairy production between Denmark and the Netherlands.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lene Hansen, Egon Noe & Katrine Højring (2006). Nature and Nature Values in Organic Agriculture. An Analysis of Contested Concepts and Values Among Different Actors in Organic Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2).
Stephanie Yue Cottee & Paul Petersan (2009). Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (5).
David Pimentel (1993). Economics and Energetics of Organic and Conventional Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1).
Mette Vaarst & Hugo Alrøe (2012). Concepts of Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Livestock Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):333-347.
Christine Leeb (2011). The Concept of Animal Welfare at the Interface Between Producers and Scientists: The Example of Organic Pig Farming. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):173-183.
C. J. C. Phillips & J. Tind Sorensen (1993). Sustainability in Cattle Production Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1).
Mette Vaarst, Lis Alban, Lisbeth Mogensen, Stig Milan, Thamsborg & Erik Steen Kristensen (2001). Health and Welfare in Danish Dairy Cattle in the Transition to Organic Production: Problems, Priorities and Perspectives. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (4):367-390.
Kate M. Millar (2000). Respect for Animal Autonomy in Bioethical Analysis: The Case of Automatic Milking Systems (AMS). Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):41-50.
N. Halberg, E. Steen Kristensen & I. Sillebak Kristensen (1995). Nitrogen Turnover on Organic and Conventional Mixed Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (1).
Theofano Vetouli, Vonne Lund & Brigitte Kaufmann (2012). Farmers' Attitude Towards Animal Welfare Aspects and Their Practice in Organic Dairy Calf Rearing: A Case Study in Selected Nordic Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):349-364.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?