Miracles and Larmer

Dialogue 42 (1):123 (2003)
This paper, a reply to Robert Larmer’s "Miracles, Evidence, and God," is the sixth in an exchange between us that began in 1985 on the epistemic status of miracles. Here I argue against Larmer’s definition of "miracle" because it is based upon an anthropomorphic understanding of laws of nature. But even granting his definition, I demonstrate that his method of showing that miracles are evidence for God is circular. I contend that if a miracle were to occur, it would be evidence against the existence of the Christian God, understood as an omnipotent, all-good, and omniscient being
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300004236
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Robert A. Larmer (1998). Questions of Miracle. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):189 - 190.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #176,451 of 1,941,042 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #115,122 of 1,941,042 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.