David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):307-330 (2010)
In various publications, Stanley Cavell and Stanley Rosen have emphasized the philosophical importance of what they both call the ordinary. They both contrast their recovery of the ordinary with traditional philosophy, including the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In this paper, I address Rosen’s claims in particular. I argue that Rosen turns the real situation on its head. Contra Rosen, it is not the case that the employment of Husserl’s epoché distorts the authentic voice of the ordinary—a voice that is clearly audible only from within everyday life. For (pace both Cavell and Rosen) there is no single voice of the ordinary: There are many such voices, not all of which are to be relied upon. Therefore, if we want to achieve an adequate grasp of ordinary experience, and Rosen does want this, we precisely need the epoché to curtail the misleading messages of certain other voices of the ordinary. Moreover, and somewhat surprisingly, this positive evaluation of the Husserlian epoché finds support in Heidegger’s writings from the twenties. I argue that Heidegger, too, believed that the epoché was an indispensable tool for the philosophical attempt to capture ordinary experience
|Keywords||Ordinary experience Epoché Husserl Heidegger Common sense|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edmund Husserl (2009). Ideen Zu Einer Reinen Phänomenologie Und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. Felix Meiner Verlag Gmbh.
A. D. Smith (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.
David Hume (1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. OUP Oxford.
Citations of this work BETA
Søren Overgaard (2015). How to Do Things with Brackets: The Epoché Explained. Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):179-195.
Similar books and articles
Andrew W. Lamb (2007). Situating Phenomenology: Husserl's Acceptance of the Contextual Powers That Be. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):603-634.
Poul Lübcke (1999). A Semantic Interpretation of Husserl's Epoché. Synthese 118 (1):1-12.
Vivian Waddell (2007). A Phenomenological Description of the Inner Voice Experience of Ordinary People. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (8):35-57.
Sharon Rider (2006). Where My Spade Turns : On Philosophy, Nihilism, and the Ordinary. In Stanley Rosen & Nalin Ranasinghe (eds.), Logos and Eros: Essays Honoring Stanley Rosen. St. Augustine's Press
Espen Dahl (2011). On Morality of Speech: Cavell's Critique of Derrida. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101.
Carolyn Sue Culbertson (2010). The Task of Ordinary Mind: Rethinking Authenticity Through the Mumonkan. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):91-104.
Lawrence F. Rhu (2006). Stanley Cavell's American Dream: Shakespeare, Philosophy, and Hollywood Movies. Fordham University Press.
Stanley Rosen (1999). Metaphysics in Ordinary Language. St. Augustine's Press.
Drew A. Hyland (2006). The "Ordinary Experience" of the Platonic Dialogues. In Stanley Rosen & Nalin Ranasinghe (eds.), Logos and Eros: Essays Honoring Stanley Rosen. St. Augustine's Press
Stanley H. Rosen (1995). The Metaphysics of Ordinary Experience. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 5 (1):41-57.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads61 ( #74,935 of 1,938,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #62,638 of 1,938,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?