Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694 (2000)
|Abstract||Stanovich & West (S&W) distinguish between evolutionary rationality and normative rationality, and System 1 and System 2 mental processes. They hold that the main function of System 2 has to do with normative and not evolutionary rationality. We ask how System 2 could then be an adaptation, especially given S&W's own work on individual differences.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rachana Kamtekar, S P E a K I N G W I T H T H E s a M E V o I C E a S R E a S o N : P E R s O N I F I C a T I O N I N P L a T o ' S P S y C H O L O G Y.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Yi Lin (1989). A Multi-Relation Approach of General Systems and Tests of Applications. Synthese 79 (3):473 - 488.
Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West (2000). Advancing the Rationality Debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50 - 65.
Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West (2003). The Rationality Debate as a Progressive Research Program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):531-533.
Lewis A. Kornhauser (2008). Aggregate Rationality in Adjudication and Legislation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):5-27.
Linda A. W. Brakel & Howard Shevrin (2003). Freud's Dual Process Theory and the Place of the a-Rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):527-528.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #161,910 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?