Rational distinctions and adaptations
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694 (2000)
| Abstract | Stanovich & West (S&W) distinguish between evolutionary rationality and normative rationality, and System 1 and System 2 mental processes. They hold that the main function of System 2 has to do with normative and not evolutionary rationality. We ask how System 2 could then be an adaptation, especially given S&W's own work on individual differences. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesH. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
Yi Lin (1989). A Multi-Relation Approach of General Systems and Tests of Applications. Synthese 79 (3):473 - 488.
Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West (2000). Advancing the Rationality Debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50 - 65.
Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West (2003). The Rationality Debate as a Progressive Research Program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):531-533.
Lewis A. Kornhauser (2008). Aggregate Rationality in Adjudication and Legislation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):5-27.
Linda A. W. Brakel & Howard Shevrin (2003). Freud's Dual Process Theory and the Place of the a-Rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):527-528.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #161,910 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
