David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 115 (1):51-77 (2006)
Why do human beings make and accept promises? What human interest is served by this procedure? Many hold that promising serves what I shall call an information interest, an interest in information about what will happen. And they hold that human beings ought to keep their promises because breaches of promise threaten this interest. On this view human beings take promises seriously because we want correct information about how other human beings are going to act. Some such view is taken for granted by most philosophical accounts of promissory obligation.1 I agree that human beings do want such information and that they often get it by accepting promises. But I doubt that promising exists because it serves this information interest.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Hanoch Sheinman (2008). Promise as Practice Reason. Acta Analytica 23 (4):287-318.
Rachel Cohon (2006). Hume on Promises and the Peculiar Act of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):25-45.
P. S. Atiyah (1981/1982). Promises, Morals, and Law. Clarendon Press.
Michael H. Robins (1984). Promising, Intending, and Moral Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Cholbi (2002). A Contractualist Account of Promising. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):475-91.
Peter Vallentyne (2006). “Natural Rights and Two Conceptions of Promising”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 81 (9):9-19.
David Owens (2007). Duress, Deception, and the Validity of a Promise. Mind 116 (462):293-315.
David Owens (2008). Promising Without Intending. Journal of Philosophy 105 (12):737-755.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #33,122 of 1,004,674 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,674 )
How can I increase my downloads?