David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 49 (4):489-498 (2010)
Does the act of creation show itself anywhere within the creation? A common contemporary ontology tends to see two possibilities for those who want to defend a notion of creation. The first is to argue that an original set of materials was brought into existence out of nothing by divine action a long time ago. The second, in the tradition of Paley, posits a specific divine action that oversees the development of some of the materials into entities with an end-directedness. Much contemporary energy focuses on the second possibility. The argument of the paper is that the ontology behind both of these possibilities, which limits itself to the notions of a creation of materials and the building of some of the materials into end-directed entities, conceals rather than reveals the idea of creation. The paper tries to show how an Aristotelian sense of nature, with its recognition of internal teleology and original spontaneity, offers a better starting point for coming up against the mystery of divine creative activity
|Keywords||Creation Teleology Intelligent design Paley Aristotle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Hume (2007/2006). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophical Review. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 338-339.
William Paley (2007). Natural Theology. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd.
Anthony Kenny (1989). The Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford University Press.
William A. Dembski (2002). No Free Lunch Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.
Michael Ruse (1973). The Philosophy of Biology. London,Hutchinson.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Miller (2014). What the Old Testament Can Contribute to an Understanding of Divine Creation. Heythrop Journal 56 (6).
Similar books and articles
William Lane Craig (1998). Creation and Conservation Once More. Religious Studies 34 (2):177-188.
Mark Ian Thomas Robson (2008). Ontology and Providence in Creation: Taking Ex Nihilo Seriously. Continuum.
R. T. Mullins (2011). Divine Perfection and Creation. Heythrop Journal 54 (5):n/a-n/a.
Adolf Grünbaum (1989). The Pseudo-Problem of Creation in Physical Cosmology. Philosophy of Science 56 (3):373-394.
Ishtiyaque Haji (2009). A Conundrum Concerning Creation. Sophia 48 (1):1-14.
Jayant V. Narlikar (1992). The Concepts of "Beginning" and "Creation" in Cosmology. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):361-371.
Donovan Cox (2002). Leibniz on Divine Causation: Creation, Miracles, and the Continual Fulgurations. Studia Leibnitiana 34 (2):185 - 207.
Sven Rune Havsteen (ed.) (2007). Creations: Medieval Rituals, the Arts, and the Concept of Creation. Marston [Distributor].
Iii George Medley (2013). The Inspiration of God and Wolfhart Pannenberg's “Field Theory of Information”. Zygon 48 (1):93-106.
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2007). Leibniz: Creation and Conservation and Concurrence. The Leibniz Review 17:31-60.
Henk G. Geertsema (2008). Knowing Within the Context of Creation. Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):237-260.
Todd R. Hanneken (2010). Creation and New Creation in the Hebrew Bible and Early Jewish Literature. In Philip J. Rossi (ed.), God, Grace, and Creation. Orbis Books
Added to index2010-12-05
Total downloads10 ( #227,553 of 1,724,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,138 of 1,724,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?