The Monist 85 (3):381-397 (2002)
|Abstract||One way of discerning what sort of control we have over our mental lives is to look at cases where that control is not exercised. This is one reason why philosophers have taken an interest in the phenomenon of akrasia, in an agent's ability to do, freely and deliberately, something that they judge they ought not to do. Akrasia constitutes a failure of control but not an absence of control. The akratic agent is not a compulsive; an akratic agent has the ability to control their action, to make it conform to their judgement, but they fail to exercise that ability. They freely and deliberately give in to temptation.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Bobonich & Pierre Destrée (eds.) (2007). Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus. Brill.
Andrei Buleandra (2009). Doxastic Transparency and Prescriptivity. Dialectica 63 (3):325-332.
Alfred R. Mele (1988). Irrationality: A Precis. Philosophical Psychology 1 (2):173-177.
Brian Ribeiro (2011). Epistemic Akrasia. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1:18-25.
Arthur F. Walker (1989). The Problem of Weakness of Will. Noûs 23 (5):653-676.
Sergio Tenenbaum (1999). The Judgment of a Weak Will. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):875-911.
David Owens (2002). Epistemic Akrasia. The Monist 85 (3):381-397.
Jessica Moss (2009). Akrasia and Perceptual Illusion. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (2):119-156.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads100 ( #6,160 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?