The Dialectical Theory of Progress: A Study of Juergen Habermas' Theory of Social Evolution

Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both the pragmatic logic of social critique and the idea of a critical social theory presuppose the possibility of distinguishing progressive from regressive forms of social change. Thus, a condition of adequacy of social critique in general, and of critical social theory in particular, is the theoretical capacity to identify progressive social change. I begin this study by showing that, since it incorporates a theory of social evolution, Habermas's conception of critical social theory satisfies this condition. ;Habermas's theory of social evolution, however, is a source of much misunderstanding in the literature. I attempt to clarify the theory with a careful reconstruction of its concepts and fundamental theses, and by systematizing the theory as a whole. The central thesis of the theory of social evolution that functions to identify progressive change is that the logic and the content of social change can be distinguished, and that we can rationally reconstruct the developmental logic of the normative structures of societies. I analyze the concept of developmental logic and defend it against some common objections, including the objection that the theory draws a false analogy between the structures of individual maturation and social rationalization. This 'ontogenetic fallacy' is not committed, I argue, because Habermas translates only the formal features of the concept of developmental logic from its genesis in psychology to social theory. ;I conclude by arguing that Habermas's theory of social evolution does entail an adequate conception of progress, but that it is insufficiently differentiated. That is, Habermas's theory explains progress in each of the dimensions of cognitive knowledge and moral insight; but it lacks an explanation of progress in the dimension of expressive self-realization. Drawing upon the conceptual resources of Habermas's theory, I show that it can account for this dimension if it also includes a notion of expressive action that is pre-discursive

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Habermas and the Grounding of Critical Theory.Dominick LaCapra - 1977 - History and Theory 16 (3):237-264.
Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.Titus Stahl - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):533-552.
History and Rationality in the Philosophy of Juergen Habermas.John Randall Groves - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Handlung und struktur.Guy A. M. Widdershoven - 1985 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (1):96-112.
Habermas's Concept of the Lifeworld.Christopher Latiolais - 1992 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Julius Sensat - 1978 - Studies in Soviet Thought 23 (1):77-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
5 (#1,344,154)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David S. Owen
University of Louisville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references