David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 24 (4):402-421 (2011)
Worries about the possibility of consent recall a more familiar problem about promising raised by Hume. To see the parallel here we must distinguish the power of consent from the normative significance of choice. I'll argue that we have normative interests, interests in being able to control the rights and obligations of ourselves and those around us, interests distinct from our interest in controlling the non-normative situation. Choice gets its normative significance from our non-normative control interests. By contrast, the possibility of consent depends on a species of normative interest that I'll call a permissive interest, an interest in its being the case that certain acts wrong us unless we declare otherwise. In the final section, I'll show how our permissive interests underwrite the possibility of consent
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kyle Fruh (2014). The Power to Promise Oneself. Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (1):61-85.
Similar books and articles
Michelle Madden Dempsey (2013). Victimless Conduct and the Volenti Maxim: How Consent Works. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):11-27.
William A. Edmundson (2011). Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Sonja Grover (2003). On the Limits of Parental Proxy Consent: Children's Right to Non-Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):349-383.
K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg (2011). Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary? Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Japa Pallikkathayil (2011). The Possibility of Choice: Three Accounts of the Problem with Coercion. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (16).
Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) (2009). The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Eric Chwang (2009). A Defense of Subsequent Consent. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):117-131.
Daryl Pullman (2002). Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):523 – 545.
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (2011). It's Good to Be Autonomous: Prospective Consent, Retrospective Consent, and the Foundation of Consent in the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):377-398.
Neil Manson (2013). Normative Consent Is Not Consent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (1):33-44.
T. M. Wilkinson (2001). Parental Consent and the Use of Dead Children's Bodies. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Joseph Millum (2014). Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
M. Potts, J. L. Verheijde, M. Y. Rady & D. W. Evans (2010). Normative Consent and Presumed Consent for Organ Donation: A Critique. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):498-499.
Angus Dawson (2008). The Normative Status of the Requirement to Gain an Informed Consent in Clinical Trials : Comprehension, Obligations, and Empirical Evidence. In Oonagh Corrigan (ed.), The Limits of Consent: A Socio-Ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford University Press
Richard O'Neil (1983). Determining Proxy Consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.
Added to index2011-11-10
Total downloads41 ( #80,533 of 1,724,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,580 of 1,724,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?