Social rules and the actions of groups: Control of physical objects
Journal of Value Inquiry 18 (1):23-34 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLa´Szlo´ E. Szabo´ (2003). Formal Systems as Physical Objects: A Physicalist Account of Mathematical Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):117-125.
Ned Markosian (2000). What Are Physical Objects? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
John A. Dewey, Adriane E. Seiffert & Thomas H. Carr (2010). Taking Credit for Success: The Phenomenology of Control in a Goal-Directed Task. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):48-62.
László E. Szabó (2003). Formal Systems as Physical Objects: A Physicalist Account of Mathematical Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):117 – 125.
Michael Stanton (1975). Judgements by Secondary School Pupils of Rules of Games and Social Actions. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):71-80.
Timothy L. S. Sprigge (1966). The Common‐Sense View of Physical Objects. Inquiry 9 (1-4):339-373.
Paul Sheehy (2006). Sharing Space: The Synchronic Identity of Social Groups. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):131-148.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
