David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):382-404 (2010)
Arius maintains that the Father must produce the Son without any pre-existing ingredients (ex nihilo) because no such ingredients are available to the Father. Athanasius denies this, insisting not only that the Father himself becomes an ingredient in the Son, but also that the Son inherits his divine properties from that ingredient. I argue, however, that it is difficult to explain exactly how the Son could inherit certain properties but not others from something he is not identical to, just as it is difficult to explain the precise way that a statue inherits certain properties but not others from the lump of bronze it is made from
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jt Paasch (2012). Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Oxford University Press.
JT Paasch (2011). Are the Father and Son Different in Kind? Scotus and Ockham on Different Kinds of Things, Univocal and Equivocal Production, and Subordination in the Trinity. Vivarium 48 (3-4):302-326.
William Hasker (2009). A Leftovian Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
Michael Rea (2003). Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
Matthew Levering (2011). Medieval Trinitarian Thought From Aquinas to Ockham (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):374-375.
Robin Le Poidevin (2013). Kenosis, Necessity and Incarnation. Heythrop Journal 54 (2):214-227.
Giuseppe Bartolozzi (2010). Origene e il dibattito sulla divinità del Logos nella prima metà del secolo III. Augustinianum 50 (1):61-82.
Einar Duenger Bohn (2011). The Logic of the Trinity. Sophia 50 (3):363-374.
Daniel Shannon (2009). Justifying Atonement: An Anselmian Response to Modern Critics. Saint Anselm Journal 6 (2):1 - 19.
Brian Leftow (2011). Composition and Christology. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea (2005). 10. Understanding the Trinity. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 8 (1).
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael Rea (2004). Understanding the Trinity. Logos 8:145-157.
D. Brent Laytham (2009). God Does Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. In God Does Not--: Entertain, Play Matchmaker, Hurry, Demand Blood, Cure Every Illness. Brazos Press.
Michael Rea (2005). 10. Understanding the Trinity. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 8 (1).
Timothy W. Bartel (1988). The Plight of the Relative Trinitarian. Religious Studies 24 (2):129 - 155.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #200,779 of 1,692,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #193,926 of 1,692,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?