Are the Father and Son Different in Kind? Scotus and Ockham on Different Kinds of Things, Univocal and Equivocal Production, and Subordination in the Trinity

Vivarium 48 (3-4):302-326 (2011)
Abstract
In this paper, I examine how Scotus and Ockham try to solve the following problem. If different kinds of constituents contribute some difference in kind to the things they constitute, then the divine Father and Son should be different in kind because they are constituted by at least some constituents that are different in kind (namely, fatherhood and sonship). However, if the Father and Son are different in kind, the Son's production will be equivocal, and equivocal products are typically less perfect than their producers. Therefore, the Son must be subordinate to the Father. In response, Scotus argues that different kinds of constituents do not necessarily result in different kinds of things, but Ockham rejects this, arguing instead that although the Father and Son are different in kind, they are still equal in perfection because of their identity with the divine essence
Keywords Univocal Production   Natural Kinds   Duns Scotus   Ockham   Equivocal Production   Constitution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    William Hasker (2009). A Leftovian Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
    Richard Cross (2012). Duns Scotus and Analogy. The Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):147-154.
    Colin Connors (2009). Scotus and Ockham. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
    Yong Li (2011). Evolution, Care and Partiality. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):241 - 249.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-11-13

    Total downloads

    19 ( #74,804 of 1,088,396 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,396 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.