Divine Production in Late Medieval Trinitarian Theology: Henry of Ghent, Duns Scotus, and William Ockham
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2012)
According to the doctrine of the Trinity, the Father, Son, and Spirit are supposed to be distinct from each other, and yet be one and the same God. As if that were not perplexing enough, there is also supposed to be an internal process of production that gives rise to the Son and Spirit: the Son is said to be 'begotten' by the Father, while the Spirit is said to 'proceed' either from the Father and the Son together, or from the Father, but through the Son. One might wonder, though, just how this sort of divine production is supposed to work. Does the Father, for instance, fashion the Son out of materials, or does he conjure up the Son out of nothing? Is there a middle ground one could take here, or is the whole idea of divine production simply unintelligible? In the late 13th and early 14th centuries, scholastic theologians subjected these questions to detailed philosophical analysis, and those discussions make up one of the most important, and one of the most neglected, aspects of late medieval trinitarian theology. This book examines the central ideas and arguments that defined this debate, namely those of Henry of Ghent, John Duns Scotus, and William Ockham. Their discussions are significant not only for the history of trinitarian theology, but also for the history of philosophy, especially regarding the notions of production and causal powers.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$87.09 new (21% off) $95.55 used (14% off) $99.00 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
JT Paasch (2011). Are the Father and Son Different in Kind? Scotus and Ockham on Different Kinds of Things, Univocal and Equivocal Production, and Subordination in the Trinity. Vivarium 48 (3-4):302-326.
Matthew Levering (2011). Medieval Trinitarian Thought From Aquinas to Ockham (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):374-375.
Russell L. Friedman (2012). Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology Among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250-1350. Brill.
Mark Gerald Henninger (1989). Relations: Medieval Theories, 1250-1325. Oxford University Press.
Jt Paasch (2010). Arius and Athanasius on the Production of God's Son. Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):382-404.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
Tobias Hoffmann (2011). Henry of Ghent's Influence on John Duns Scotus's Metaphysics. In Gordon A. Wilson (ed.), The Brill Companion to Henry of Ghent. Brill.
Michael Rea (2003). Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
Timothy W. Bartel (1988). The Plight of the Relative Trinitarian. Religious Studies 24 (2):129 - 155.
William Hasker (2009). A Leftovian Trinity? Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
William A. Frank (1992). Duns Scotus on Autonomous Freedom and Divine Co-Causality. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 2:142-164.
Jerome V. Brown (1976). John Duns Scotus on Henry of Ghent's Arguments for Divine Illumination: The Statement of the Case. Vivarium 14 (2):94-113.
Kenneth A. Bryson (2011). An Interpretation of Genesis 1:26. Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):189-215.
Richard Cross (2003). Duns Scotus on Divine Substance and the Trinity. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (02):181-201.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads13 ( #121,219 of 1,101,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,275 of 1,101,779 )
How can I increase my downloads?