David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dialogue 42 (03):447- (2003)
I argue that in order to solve the main difficulties confronted by the classical versions of the causal theory of action, it is necessary no just to make room for intentions, considered as irreducible to complexes of beliefs and desires, but also to distinguish among several types of intentions. I present a three-tiered theory of intentions that distinguishes among future-directed intentions, present-directed intentions and motor intentions. I characterize each kind of intention in terms of its functions, its type of content, its dynamics and the rationality and time constraints that bear on it. I then try to show how the difficulties encountered by the causal theory can be solved within this new framework. 1.
|Keywords||Philosophy of action Intention|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John R. Searle (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Donald Davidson (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.
Michael Bratman (1987/1999). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
John Searle (1983). Intentionality. Oxford University Press.
Robert B. Brandom (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Elisabeth Pacherie (2008). The Phenomenology of Action: A Conceptual Framework. Cognition 107 (1):179 - 217.
Anja Berninger & Sabine Döring (2012). Emotion and Perception of One’s Own Actions – A Comment on Wilke, Synofzik and Lindner. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):46-47.
Similar books and articles
Elisabeth Pacherie (2000). The Content of Intentions. Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard (2010). What Are Intentions? In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press 70--84.
Raimo Tuomela (2005). We-Intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Renée Bilodeau (2006). The Motivational Strength of Intentions. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:129-135.
Richard Scheer (2004). The ‘Mental State’ Theory of Intentions. Philosophy 79 (1):121-131.
Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia (2014). Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):119-145.
Bruno Verbeek (ed.) (2007). Reasons and Intentions. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Chrisoula Andreou (2009). Taking on Intentions. Ratio 22 (2):157-169.
John R. Searle (1979). The Intentionality of Intention and Action. Inquiry 22 (1-4):253 – 280.
Christoph Lumer (2005). Intentions Are Optimality Beliefs – but Optimizing What? Erkenntnis 62 (2):235 - 262.
Luca Ferrero (2009). Conditional Intentions. Noûs 43 (4):700 - 741.
Maciej Witek (2009). Scepticism About Reflexive Intentions Refuted. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83.
Michael Ridge (1998). Humean Intentions. American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):157-178.
Hugh J. McCann (1998). The Works of Agency: On Human Action, Will, and Freedom. Cornell University Press.
Alfred R. Mele (2008). Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing. Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Added to index2010-09-25
Total downloads26 ( #143,114 of 1,790,533 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #325,851 of 1,790,533 )
How can I increase my downloads?