Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432 (2000)
|Abstract||I argue that in order to solve the main difficulties confronted by the classical versions of the causal theory of action, it is necessary no just to make room for intentions, considered as irreducible to complexes of beliefs and desires, but also to distinguish among several types of intentions. I present a three-tiered theory of intentions that distinguishes among future-directed intentions, present-directed intentions and motor intentions. I characterize each kind of intention in terms of its functions, its type of content, its dynamics and the rationality and time constraints that bear on it. I then try to show how the difficulties encountered by the causal theory can be solved within this new framework. 1|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Élisabeth Pacherie (2003). La Dynamique des Intentions. Dialogue 42 (03):447-.
Alfred R. Mele (2008). Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing. Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Bruno Verbeek (ed.) (2007). Reasons and Intentions. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Renée Bilodeau (2006). The Motivational Strength of Intentions. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:129-135.
Richard Scheer (2004). The ‘Mental State’ Theory of Intentions. Philosophy 79 (1):121-131.
Maciej Witek (2009). Scepticism About Reflexive Intentions Refuted. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83.
Alfred R. Mele (1987). Are Intentions Self-Referential? Philosophical Studies 52 (3):309-329.
Raimo Tuomela (2005). We-Intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Raimo Tuomela (2000). Collective and Joint Intention. Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
Chrisoula Andreou (2009). Taking on Intentions. Ratio 22 (2):157-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #17,310 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #4,511 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?