Can History Measure Eternity? A Reply to William Craig

Religious Studies 27 (3):333 - 335 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanatory priority: Transitive and unequivocal, a reply to William Craig.William Hasker - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):389-393.
Divine eternity.William Lane Craig - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Eternal Present and Stump-Kretzmann Eternity.William Lane Craig - 1999 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):521-536.
Omniscience and Eternity: A Reply to Craig.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):369-376.
Omniscience, Tensed Facts, and Divine Eternity.William Lane Craig - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Reply to Smith: On the Finitude of the Past.William Lane Craig - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (2):225-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
31 (#503,056)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references