David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):123-139 (2012)
Allen Carlson has argued that a proper aesthetics of nature must judge nature for ‘what it is’, and that such judgements must be informed by a scientific understanding of nature, in particular, one shaped by the science of ecology. Carlson uses these claims to support his theory of positive aesthetics. This paper argues that there are problems in this view. First, it misunderstands ecology, thereby adopting a view of the natural world that holds it to be much more integrated than it is. Second, it ignores an even more fundamental science of nature, evolution. Thus, it misunderstands both ecology and nature. An alternative to this view would be an aesthetics based on an evolutionary understanding of nature, which holds that, although there are many functional wholes in nature, there is also significant conflict, disintegration, and incongruent scales. A proper aesthetics of nature must take these conflicts into account. The paper ends with a sketch of an aesthetic theory based on the science of evolution
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kwang Myung Kim (2015). Problems and Prospects of Geoaesthetics. Open Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):1-14.
Similar books and articles
Jason Boaz Simus (2008). Aesthetic Implications of the New Paradigm in Ecology. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (1):63-79.
Glenn Parsons (2002). Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):279-295.
Jason Simus (2008). Aesthetic Implications of the New Paradigm in Ecology. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (1):63-79.
Allen Carlson (2000). Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art, and Architecture. Routledge.
Allen Carlson (1984). Nature and Positive Aesthetics. Environmental Ethics 6 (1):5-34.
Malcolm Budd (1996). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Anton Killin (2013). The Arts and Human Nature: Evolutionary Aesthetics and the Evolutionary Status of Art Behaviours. Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):703-718.
Malcolm Budd (2002). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Allen Carlson (2009). Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. Columbia University Press.
Glenn Parsons (2004). Natural Functions and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Inorganic Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):44-56.
R. Wilson (2008). Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):239-240.
Allen Carlson (2007). The Requirements for An Adequate Aesthetics of Nature. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1/2):1-13.
Eric S. Nelson (2012). Aesthetics, Ethics and Nature in Adorno. In Jerome / Giles Carroll (ed.), Aesthetics and Modernity from Schiller to the Frankfurt School. Peter Lang
Noel E. Boulting (1999). The Aesthetics of Nature. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3/4):21-34.
Antony Fredriksson (2011). Environmental Aesthetics Beyond the Dialectics of Interest and Disinterest Deconstructing the Myth of Pristine Nature. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 22 (40-41).
Added to index2012-03-13
Total downloads17 ( #209,356 of 1,793,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #280,900 of 1,793,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?