David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hobbes Studies 9 (1):21-31 (1996)
In my research published last year, i.e. Homo homini deus. Per un'introduzione al pensiero giuridico di Francis Bacon, I have analytically presented the Aphorismi de Jure gentium maiore sive de fontibus justiciae et iuris and I have closely studied the relationship between the legal and political philosophy of the Lord Chancellor and the civil science of Thomas Hobbes1. In the present essay I will try to summarize some of the main reasons why I think that manuscript of Chatsworth House, discovered to be Bacon's only in 1980, is so important. It clarifies, with its twenty aphorisms, some crucial principles of Bacon's civil philosophy that would probably remain otherwise shadowed. So, here I will take as an excellent example that concept of sovereignty which is presented in the Aphorismi. His famous silences - for which the Lord Chancellor has been often considered the worthy, English heir of Machiavelli: 'We're much beholden...'2, - will be better understood at the light of this 'new' text. However, there is not only this sort of silence that Baconian scholars have to face and to understand, also a historiographical tradition has been consolidated in the twentieth century that has almost forgotten Bacon's civil philosophy. Those Bacon's legal and political texts that have been still considered and analyzed by philosophical critique, have been generally misunderstood. So, in order to avoid as far as possible such a fate for the Aphorismi de Jure gentium maiore either, it is necessary to consider that historical context which, as we shall see, depends very much on separating Bacon as a political thinker from his younger contemporary, Thomas Hobbes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ugo Pagallo (1998). Bacon, Hobbes and the Homo Homini Deus Formula. Hobbes Studies 11 (1):61-69.
Dietrich Schotte (2012). Institutio Oratoria: Bacon, Hobbes, Descartes, Spinoza. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):205-209.
Robin Bunce (2003). Thomas Hobbes' Relationship with Francis Bacon - an Introduction. Hobbes Studies 16 (1):41-83.
Richard A. Lee (2000). The Play of Force Versus the Reduction of Force: Hobbes and Roger Bacon on Perception. Hobbes Studies 13 (1):34-45.
George Croom Robertson (1910/1970). Hobbes. St. Clair Shores, Mich.,Scholarly Press.
Fārābī (2001). Alfarabi, the Political Writings: Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts. Cornell University Press.
Karl Schuhmann (1984). Francis Bacon und Hobbes' Widmungsbrief zu De cive. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 38 (2):165 - 190.
Benoît Angelet (1979). Une Logique de L'Ignorance: La Dialectique du Pouvoir Dans la Lignée de Bacon, Descartes Et Hobbes. Philosophica 24.
Max Köhler (1902). Die Naturphilosophie des Th. Hobbes in Ihrer Abhängigkeit von Bacon. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 15 (3):370-400.
Craig Walton (1990). Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy: A New Source, And: Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal, And: Science, Faith, and Politics: Francis Bacon and the Utopian Roots of the Modern Age: A Commentary of Bacon's "Advancement of Learning" (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2):289-293.
Thomas Hobbes (1995). Thomas Hobbes: Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes. University of Chicago Press.
Francis Bacon (1969). The Works of Francis Bacon. St. Clair Shores, Mich.,Scholarly Press.
Added to index2012-03-15
Total downloads7 ( #274,000 of 1,699,425 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,425 )
How can I increase my downloads?