Bonnie Steinbock comments and on and criticisms of Peter Singer's "speciesism" argument

Abstract

Bonnie Steinbock argues that Peter Singer has made an important contribution to remind us that animals deserve very special consideration, but that he fails to make a compelling case against "speciesism."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Speciesism and the Idea of Equality.Bonnie Steinbock - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (204):247 - 256.
The Oxford handbook of bioethics.Bonnie Steinbock (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Speciesism and moral status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals.Bonnie Steinbock - 1981 - Philosophical Books 22 (4):217-219.
What is speciesism?Oscar Horta - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266.
Prenatal wrongful death.Bonnie Steinbock - 1987 - Bioethics 1 (4):301–320.
Drunk driving.Bonnie Steinbock - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3):278-295.
Moral reasons and relativism.Bonnie Steinbock - 1981 - Journal of Value Inquiry 15 (2):157-168.
Luckless or clueless?Bonnie Steinbock - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):274 – 275.
Defining parenthood.Bonnie Steinbock - 2006 - In John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain (eds.), Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Hart.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
107 (#150,928)

6 months
1 (#1,027,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references