David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):319-328 (2012)
The paper examines how technology challenges conventional borders of national legal systems, as shown by cases that scholars address as a part of their everyday work in the fields of information technology (IT)-Law, i.e., computer crimes, data protection, digital copyright, and so forth. Information on the internet has in fact a ubiquitous nature that transcends political borders and questions the notion of the law as made of commands enforced through physical sanctions. Whereas many of today’s impasses on jurisdiction, international conflicts of law and diverging interpretations of statutes can be addressed by embedding legal safeguards in ICT and other kinds of technology, to overcome the ineffectiveness of state action by design entails its own risks, e.g., threats of paternalism hinging on the regulatory tools of technology. Rather than modelling people’s behaviour by design, the article suggests that design policies should respect individual and collective autonomy by decreasing the impact of harm-generating behaviour (e.g., security measures and default settings for data protection), or by widening the range of people’s choices (e.g., user friendly interfaces)
|Keywords||Autonomy Data protection Design Digital rights management Information technology Law Jurisdiction Paternalism Privacy by design Self-enforcement technologies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Judith Butler (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham University Press.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Luciano Floridi & J. W. Sanders (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3):349-379.
Luciano Floridi (2002). On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):287-304.
Citations of this work BETA
Ugo Pagallo (2013). Online Security and the Protection of Civil Rights: A Legal Overview. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Technology 26 (4):381-395.
Ugo Pagallo (2015). The Realignment of the Sources of the Law and Their Meaning in an Information Society. Philosophy and Technology 28 (1):57-73.
Similar books and articles
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson (eds.) (2005). Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Kevin Crotty (2001). Law's Interior: Legal and Literary Constructions of the Self. Cornell University Press.
Colin Bird (2006). John Christman and Joel Anderson, Eds., Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays:Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. Ethics 116 (3):578-582.
Erik Rietveld & Ronald Rietveld (2011). The Paradox of Spontaneity and Design: Designing Spontaneous Interactions. Oase 2011 (85):33-41.
Dr Edward Lestrade, J. OSt & LLD, European Union Design Protection Law and Design Protection in Europe.
Onora O'Neill (2003). The Inaugural Address: Autonomy: The Emperor's New Clothes. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77:1 - 21.
J. David Velleman (2005). The Self as Narrator. In Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Elliott Sober (2008). Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
K. W. M. Fulford & Lubomira Radoilska (2012). Three Challenges From Delusion for Theories of Autonomy. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press 44-74.
Henrik Palmer Olsen (2007). Architectures of Justice: Legal Theory and the Idea of Institutional Design. Ashgate Pub. Co..
Michael Hampe & Silke Lang (eds.) (2009). The Design of Material, Organism, and Minds: Different Understandings of Design. Springer.
George R. Lucas (2011). Industrial Challenges of Military Robotics. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (4):274-295.
Added to index2012-06-08
Total downloads12 ( #280,063 of 1,792,244 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,595 of 1,792,244 )
How can I increase my downloads?