Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Ordinary intuitions that vague predicates are tolerant, or cannot have sharp boundaries, can be formalized in first-order logic in at least two non-equivalent ways, a stronger and a weaker. The stronger turns out to be false in domains that have a significant central gap for the predicate in question, i.e. where a sufficiently large middle segment of the ordering relation (such as taller for ‘tall’) is uninstantiated. The weaker principle is true in such domains, but does not in those domains induce the sorites conclusion.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Martin Otto (2001). Two Variable First-Order Logic Over Ordered Domains. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):685-702.
David J. Chalmers (2009). The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Sven Walter (eds.), Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Carla Fehr (2001). The Evolution of Sex: Domains and Explanatory Pluralism. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 16 (2):145-170.
M. Andrew Moshier & Carl J. Pollard (1994). The Domain of Set-Valued Feature Structures. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (6):607 - 631.
Kim Sterelny (1996). Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):193-214.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1987). Domains of Discourse. Logique Et Analyse 117:173-176.
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Gap Principles, Penumbral Consequence, and Infinitely Higher-Order Vagueness. In J. C. Beall (ed.), New Essays on the Semantics of Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,353 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?