Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding [Book Review]
Argumentation 25 (2):127-139 (2011)
|Abstract||Traditionally, an enthymeme is an incomplete argument, made so by the absence of one or more of its constituent statements. An enthymeme resolution strategy is a set of procedures for finding those missing elements, thus reconstructing the enthymemes and restoring its meaning. It is widely held that a condition on the adequacy of such procedures is that statements restored to an enthymeme produce an argument that is good in some given respect in relation to which the enthymeme itself is bad. In previous work, we emphasized the role of parsimony in enthymeme resolution strategies and concomitantly downplayed the role of charity . In the present paper, we take the analysis of enthymemes a step further. We will propose that if the pragmatic features that attend the phenomenon of enthymematic communication are duly heeded, the very idea of reconstructing enthymemes loses much of its rationale, and their interpretation comes to be conceived in a new light|
|Keywords||Enthymemes Bounded rationality Interpretation|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fabio Paglieri & John Woods (2011). Enthymematic Parsimony. Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.
Hans Kamp (1969). Enthymemes. Santa Monica, Calif.,System Development Corp..
D. Walton & C. A. Reed (2005). Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes. Synthese 145 (3):339 - 370.
Joel Marks (1988). When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy? Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.
Nancy Green (2010). Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
S. Marc Cohen & David Keyt (1992). Analyzing Plato's Arguments: Plato and Platonism. In J. Klagge & N. Smith (eds.), Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues. Oxford University Press.
Georg Brun & Hans Rott (2013). Interpreting Enthymematic Arguments Using Belief Revision. Synthese 190 (18):4041-4063.
Gilbert Plumer (2000). The Paradoxical Associated Conditional of Enthymemes. In Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen & Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Nathan Crick (2004). Conquering Our Imagination: Thought Experiments and Enthymemes in Scientific Argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 37 (1):21-41.
John E. Nolt (1986). Entailment, Enthymemes, and Formalization. Journal of Philosophy 83 (10):572-573.
Arthur B. Miller & John D. Bee (1972). Enthymemes: Body and Soul. Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (4):201 - 214.
Nelson Pole (1980). Enthymemes in Propositional Logic. Teaching Philosophy 3 (3):325-330.
Jukka Mikkonen (2010). On the Body of Literary Persuasion. Estetika 47 (1):51-71.
Jan Willem Wieland (2012). Regress Argument Reconstruction. Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap Jr (1961). Enthymemes. Journal of Philosophy 58 (23):713-723.
Added to index2011-04-18
Total downloads20 ( #68,206 of 722,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?