Is compositionality compatible with holism?

Mind and Language 12 (1):11-33 (1997)
Peter Pagin Is the principle of semantic compositionality compatible with the principle of semantic holism? The question is of interest, since both principles have a lot that speaks for them, and since they do seem to be in conflict. The view that natural languages have compositional structure is almost unavoidable, since linguistic communication by means of new combinations of words would be virtually incomprehensible otherwise. And holism too seems generally plausible, since the meaning of an expression is directly connected with the way that expression interacts with other.
Keywords Composition  Holism  Language  Learning  Semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00034
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Gilbert Harman (1973). Thought. Princeton University Press.
Ned Block (1986). Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):615-78.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Eli Dresner (2012). Meaning Holism. Philosophy Compass 7 (9):611-619.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

86 ( #33,714 of 1,725,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #81,232 of 1,725,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.