David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 26 (4):347-354 (2011)
This paper adopts a legal perspective to counter some exaggerations of today’s debate on the social understanding of robotics. According to a long and well-established tradition, there is in fact a relative strong consensus among lawyers about some key notions as, say, agency and liability in the current use of robots. However, dealing with a field in rapid evolution, we need to rethink some basic tenets of the contemporary legal framework. In particular, time has come for lawyers to acknowledge that some acts of robots should be considered as a new source of legal responsibility for others’ behaviour.
|Keywords||Agency Legal systems Liability Moral accountability Responsibility Robots|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Luciano Floridi & J. W. Sanders (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3):349-379.
Terrell Ward Bynum (2006). Flourishing Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):157-173.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Dreier & Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann (2012). Legal Aspects of Service Robotics. Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):201-217.
Ugo Pagallo (2010). Robotrust and Legal Responsibility. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):367-379.
James Boyle (ed.) (1992). Critical Legal Studies. New York University Press.
Geoffrey C. Hazard (2004). Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study. Stanford University Press.
Elisabetta Iossa & Bruno Jullien, The Market for Lawyers: The Value of Information on the Quality of Legal Services.
Ugo Pagallo (2011). Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective. Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
Lee McCauley (2007). AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):153-164.
Robert P. George (ed.) (1996). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Michael Decker, Rüdiger Dillmann, Thomas Dreier, Martin Fischer, Mathias Gutmann, Ingrid Ott & Indra Spiecker Genannt Döhmann (2011). Service Robotics: Do You Know Your New Companion? Framing an Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 8 (1):25-44.
Manuel Vargas (2010). Are Psychopathic Serial Killers Evil? Are They Blameworthy for What They Do? In Sarah Waller (ed.), Serial Killers and Philosophy. Blackwell
Edoardo Datteri (2013). Predicting the Long-Term Effects of Human-Robot Interaction: A Reflection on Responsibility in Medical Robotics. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):139-160.
Rand D. LeBouvier, Reflections in a Robot's Eye: A Cultural History and Epistemological Critque of Humanoid Robotics.
Joanne Stagg-Taylor (2012). Lawyers' Business: Conflicts of Duties Arising From Lawyers' Business Models. Legal Ethics 14 (2):173-192.
Added to index2011-10-28
Total downloads19 ( #145,074 of 1,725,561 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,561 )
How can I increase my downloads?