David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):53-77 (2004)
In this paper I provide a compelling argument against the thesis that Aristotle’s understanding of the relation between the soul and the body can be construed asfunctionalist, despite some passages that would seem to support such an interpretation. Toward this end, in section I of the essay I offer an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of the soul-body relation that emphasizes the non-contingent nature of the connection between the soul and a specific kind of body, arguing that Aristotle’s account of the soul as the “form” and “actuality” of the living thing, and of the organic body as its “matter” and “potentiality,” shows their necessary relation with one another. In section II, I present the functionalist account of mind, placing especial emphasis on its post-Cartesian genesis, which takes seriously the “problematic” status of the relation between mind and body. I then attempt to show, in section III, how because functionalism holds that psychic capacities can be realized within a number of different material bases, including physical and artificial systems, it is incompatible with Aristotle’s conception of the necessary soul-body relation, and thus that Aristotle’s account of psuche is not best construed as functionalist
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. P. Bos (2003). The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle's Philosophy of Living Nature. Brill.
Abraham P. Bos (2010). The Soul's Instrument for Touching in Aristotle, on the Soul II 11, 422b34–423a21. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 92 (1):89-102.
Christopher D. Green (1998). The Thoroughly Modern Aristotle: Was He Really a Functionalist? [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Richard McDonough (2000). Aristotle's Critique of Functionalist Theories of Mind. Idealistic Studies 30 (3):209-232.
L. S. Carrier (2006). Aristotelian Materialism. Philosophia 34 (3):253-266.
Italo Testa (2012). Hegel's Naturalism, or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia. In David Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, SUNY Press Albany, New York (pp. 19-35). SUNY Press.
J. S. & M. Gary (2008). Plotinus on the Soul's Omnipresence in Body. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):113-127.
Abraham P. Bos (2010). Aristotle on the Difference Between Plants, Animals, and Human Beings and on the Elements as Instruments of the Soul (De Anima 2.4.415b18). [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 63 (4):821-841.
Michael Golluber (2001). Aristotle on Knowledge and the Sense of Touch. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:655-680.
Ronald M. Polansky (2007). Aristotle's de Anima. Cambridge University Press.
W. F. R. Hardie (1964). Aristotle's Treatment of the Relation Between the Soul and the Body. Philosophical Quarterly 14 (54):53-72.
Martha Craven Nussbaum & Amélie Rorty (eds.) (1992). Essays on Aristotle's De Anima. Oxford University Press.
John Philoponus (2006). On Aristotle's "on the Soul 1.3-5". Cornell University Press.
Filip Karfík (2012). The Constitution of the Human Body in Plato's Timaeus. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):167-181.
Richard Sorabji (1993). Body and Soul in Aristotle. In Michael Durrant & Aristotle (eds.), Aristotle's De Anima in Focus. Routledge. 63-.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #106,398 of 1,088,378 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,378 )
How can I increase my downloads?