David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):515-534 (2007)
This paper challenges some of the basic epistemological assumptions that underpin our current conceptions of accountability.Recent legislative developments like Sarbanes-Oxley attempt to enhance accountability in the business environment through the employment of checks and balances and the threat of individual liability. This kind of legalistic strategy still seems to assume the existence of an individual agent who employs moral principles to come to decisions in a deliberate, impartial manner. This paper will emphasize that moral decision-making often does not take place in this manner, but is rather a tacit process of sensing what the appropriate behavior would be. Accountability, both with respect to individuals and organizations, is less a matter of “accounting for” a set of concrete assets, than a question of being accountable to a set of internal and external stakeholders, or in terms of the tacit sense of moral propriety that develops among business associates and colleagues over time
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Gibson (2011). Toward an Intermediate Position on Corporate Moral Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (S1):71-81.
Similar books and articles
Mollie Painter-Morland (2006). Redefining Accountability as Relational Responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):89 - 98.
Ann Cavoukian, Scott Taylor & Martin E. Abrams (2010). Privacy by Design: Essential for Organizational Accountability and Strong Business Practices. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):405-413.
Danielle Beu & M. Ronald Buckley (2001). The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):57 - 73.
Lance McMahon (1995). Corporate Accountability in Australia: Managing the Information Environment for Corporate Accountability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):673 - 681.
Helen Nissenbaum (1996). Accountability in a Computerized Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):25-42.
Linda A. Galindo (2009). The 85% Solution: How Personal Accountability Guarantees Success: No Nonsense, No Excuses. Jossey-Bass.
Andreas Rasche & Daniel E. Esser (2006). From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):251 - 267.
Annette Rid (2009). Justice and Procedure: How Does “Accountability for Reasonableness” Result in Fair Limit-Setting Decisions? Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):12-16.
Leif Wenar (2006). Accountability in International Development Aid. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (1):1–23.
Jens Steffek (2010). Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):45-68.
John G. Miller (2004). Qbq!: The Question Behind the Question: Practicing Personal Accountability in Work and in Life. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
Salvatore Finamore, Accountability and Bureaucratic Pathologies in International Organizations: A Social Constructivist Perspective.
Lisa H. Newton, Louis Hodges & Susan Keith (2004). Accountability in the Professions: Accountability in Journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3 & 4):166 – 190.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads27 ( #145,335 of 1,907,886 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #195,456 of 1,907,886 )
How can I increase my downloads?