David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):317-333 (2005)
In this essay I argue that the Stranger’s interest in keeping the philosopher and the sophist distinct is connected, primarily, to his assessment of the charges ofsophistry advanced against Socrates, which compels him to defend Socrates from these unduly advanced accusations. On this basis, I establish that the Stranger’s task in the Sophist, namely to keep philosophy distinct from sophistry, is intimately tied to the project of securing justice and is therefore not merely of theoretical importance but is also—and essentially—of political and ethical significance
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tea Logar (2010). “Diagnostic Hedonism” and the Role of Incommensurability in Plato's Protagoras. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):241-257.
Sandra Peterson (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2000). Who's a Philosopher? Who's a Sophist? The Stranger V. Socrates. Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):65 - 97.
Cathal Woods & Ryan Pack, Socrates of Athens: Euthyphro, Socrates' Defense, Crito and the Death Scene From Phaedo.
Emily R. Wilson (2007). The Death of Socrates. Harvard University Press.
C. C. W. Taylor (2006). Socrates the Sophist. In Lindsay Judson & V. Karasmanēs (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
R. J. W. (1966). Recollections of Socrates and Socrates' Defense Before the Jury. Review of Metaphysics 20 (1):162-163.
Emily Wilson (2008). What is Wrong with Socrates? The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (41):49-54.
Gerald A. Press (2012). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):133-135.
David Boonin‐Vail (1989). The Parthenon Papers. Critical Review 3 (3-4):579-588.
Mehmet Karabela (2012). The Ironic Defense of Socrates: Plato’s Apology, David Leibowitz, Cambridge University Press, 2010. [REVIEW] Political Studies Review 10 (3):401-402.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads1 ( #434,265 of 1,098,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?