David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Contemporary Chinese Thought 11 (2):40-54 (1979)
Everybody knows that the Revolution of 1911 was an anti-imperialist and antifeudal democratic revolution led by the revolutionary and democratic group of the bourgeoisie in the period of the old democratic revolution in China. The leader of that revolution was Sun Yat-sen, and the guiding ideology was his old Three People's Principles. It is well known that Chairman Mao has made a series of scientific appraisals of these facts, but the newspapers and magazines controlled by the anti-Party clique of Wang Hung-wen, Chang Ch'un-ch'iao, Chiang Ch'ing and Yao Wen-yuan openly oppose Chairman Mao's scientific appraisals, betraying the fundamental principles of Marxism, distorting the Revolution of 1911 as a struggle between Confucians and Legalists, and replacing Sun Yat-sen as the standard-bearer of the revolution with Chang T'ai-yen, who played first an active and then a devastating role in the revolution. All this is part of the clique's attack on the Party in order to usurp the Party, seize power, restore capitalism and fabricate the "history" of the struggle between the Confucians and the Legalists
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Liu Hsien-Chao, Sun Tung-Po, Chi Shu-Shih & Li Fan (1978). On the Relations Between Confucianists and Legalists in the Han Dynasties. Contemporary Chinese Thought 10 (1):44-63.
Ruiping Fan (2010). A Confucian Reflection on Genetic Enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):62 – 70.
H. E. Butler (1912). Some New Works on Propertius (1) Sex. Propertii Elegiarum Libri IV. Recensuit Carolus Hosius. Pp. Xiv + 190. Leipzig: Teubner, 1911. M. 1.60 Unbound; M. 2 Bound. (2) Ad Propertii Carmina Commentarius Criticus. By P. J. Enk. Pp. Xi + 365. Zutphen: W. J. Thieme Et Cie., 1911. (3) The Manuscripts of Propertius. By B. L. Ullman. Classical Philology, VI. 3. Pp. 282–301. July, 1911. (4) Propertiana. By B. O. Foster. Matzke Memorial Volume. Pp. 100–110. California: Stanford University, 1911. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (05):168-171.
A. N. Shlepakov (1976). The Revolution in Science and Technology and the Ideological Struggle. Russian Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):73-77.
Wei Hua (1978). Socialist Revolution and Inner-Party Line Struggle. Contemporary Chinese Thought 10 (2):16-25.
Steve Smith (2007). Revolution and Counterrevolution: Class Struggle in a Moscow Metal Factory. Historical Materialism 15 (4):167-185.
Xinyan Jiang (2012). Confucius's View of Courage. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):44-59.
Nader Hashemi (2010). Religious Disputation and Democratic Constitutionalism: The Enduring Legacy of the Constitutional Revolution on the Struggle for Democracy in Iran. Constellations 17 (1):50-60.
Shiling Xiang (2010). Inquiry Into the Transcendence of Tang Dynasty Confucians to Han Dynasty Confucians and the Transformation of Traditional Confucianism in Terms of Lunyu Bijie. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):471-485.
Marianne Moyaert (2010). The Struggle for Recognition. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):105-130.
W. Warde Fowler (1912). The Text of the Corpus Agrimensorum Die Handschriften des Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. Dr. Von C. Thulin. Berlin: Reimer, 1911. Zur Überlieferungsgeschichte des Corpus Agrimensorum. Von C. Thulin. Göteborg, 1911. Humanistische Handschriften des Corpus Agrimensorum. Von C. Thulin. (Rheinisches Museum Für Philologie, 1911). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (08):267-268.
Ming-Huei Lee (2008). Wang Yangming's 王陽明 Philosophy and Modern Theories of Democracy: A Reconstructive Interpretation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (3):283-294.
Chin Sheng-Hsi (1976). The Debate Between the Confucianists and the Legalists Over the Question of Ancient History During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. Contemporary Chinese Thought 7 (3):57-77.
Etienne Balibar (1991). From Class Struggle to Struggle Without Classes? Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 14 (1):7-21.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads11 ( #322,184 of 1,911,469 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,815 of 1,911,469 )
How can I increase my downloads?