Graduate studies at Western
Nanoethics 5 (1):43-48 (2011)
|Abstract||In his paper The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken problem (Nanoethics 2:305–316, 2008) Paul Thompson argues that the possibility of disenhancing animals in order to improve animal welfare poses a philosophical conundrum. Although many people intuitively think such disenhancement would be morally impermissible, it’s difficult to find good arguments to support such intuitions. In this brief response to Thompson, I accept that there’s a conundrum here. But I argue that if we seriously consider whether creating beings can harm or benefit them, and introduce the non-identity problem to discussions of animal disehancement, the conundrum is even deeper than Thompson suggests|
|Keywords||Paul Thompson Ethics Animals Livestock Animal rights Nanotechnology Biotechnology Non-identity problem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arianna Ferrari (2012). Animal Disenhancement for Animal Welfare: The Apparent Philosophical Conundrums and the Real Exploitation of Animals. A Response to Thompson and Palmer. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 6 (1):65-76.
Paul B. Thompson (2008). The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken Problem. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 2 (3):305-316.
Adam Henschke (2012). Making Sense of Animal Disenhancement. Nanoethics 6 (1):55-64.
Soraj Hongladarom (2012). The Disenhancement Problem in Agriculture: A Reply to Thompson. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 6 (1):47-54.
John Weckert (2012). Symposium on Animal Disenhancement: Introduction. [REVIEW] Nanoethics 6 (1):39-40.
Neil Levy (2002). The Apology Paradox and the Non-Identity Problem. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):358-368.
Nathan Nobis (2002). The Real Problem of Infant and Animal Suffering. Philo 5 (2):216-225.
John Hadley (2012). Confining 'Disenhanced'Animals. Nanoethics 6 (1):41-46.
Sydney Shoemaker (2008). Persons, Animals, and Identity. Synthese 162 (3):313 - 324.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Gavrell Ortiz & Sara Elizabeth (2004). Beyond Welfare: Animal Integrity, Animal Dignity, and Genetic Engineering. Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):94-120.
Michael J. Murray (2008). Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-04-06
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 731,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?