Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Using the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines as a paradigm for ethics training [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):77 - 84 (2001)
Although Business Ethics has become a topic of wide discussion in both academia and the corporate world, questions remain as how to present ethical issues in a manner that will effectively influence the decisions and behavior of business employees. In this paper we argue that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (FSG) offer a unique opportunity for bridging the gap between the theory and practice of business ethics. We first explain what the FSG are and how they apply to organizations. We then show how discussions of the FSG might be used in business ethics courses in a way that is both theoretically sound and practically applicable. Finally, we show how the requirements of the FSG can be used by companies to develop effective ethical compliance programs. As such, we maintain that the FSG provide a powerful heuristic tool for the teaching and training of business ethics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nabil Ibrahim, John Angelidis & Igor M. Tomic (2009). Managers' Attitudes Toward Codes of Ethics: Are There Gender Differences? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):343 - 353.
Sean Valentine, Lynn Godkin, Gary M. Fleischman & Roland Kidwell (2011). Corporate Ethical Values, Group Creativity, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: The Impact of Work Context on Work Response. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (3):353 - 372.
Nicolas S. Majluf & Carolina M. Navarrete (2011). A Two-Component Compliance and Ethics Program Model: An Empirical Application to Chilean Corporations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 100 (4):567 - 579.
Similar books and articles
Michael A. Simons, Departing Ways: Uniformity, Disparity, and Cooperation in Federal Drug Sentences.
Paul Fiorelli & Ann Marie Tracey, Why Comply? Organizational Guidelines Offer a Safer Harbor in the Storm.
Dove Izraeli & Mark S. Schwartz (1998). What Can We Learn From the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizational Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1045-1055.
Avshalom M. Adam & Dalia Rachman-moore (2004). The Methods Used to Implement an Ethical Code of Conduct and Employee Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (3):225 - 244.
Robert J. Rafalko (1994). Remaking the Corporation: The 1991 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):625 - 636.
Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly (1996). The Ethics of Sentencing White-Collar Criminals. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
John Hoaglund (1984). Ethical Theory and Practice: Is There a Gap? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 3 (3):201 - 205.
John W. Hill (1993). The Organization of Ethics and the Ethics of Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):27-43.
Norman E. Bowie (2004). A Kantian Perspective on the Characteristics of Ethics Programs. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):275-292.
O. C. Ferrell, Debbie Thorne LeClair & Linda Ferrell (1998). The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Compliance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):353-363.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #230,806 of 1,103,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #121,213 of 1,103,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?