Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 3 (4):355-383 (1989)
|Abstract||This is a series of two articles examining Kant’s attitude toward mystical experiences and the relation between his interest in these and his interest in constructing a Critical system of metaphysics.“The Critical Dreams” begins by questioning the traditional division between “Critical” (1770 onwards) and “pre-Critical” periods in Kant’s development. After explaining Kant’s Critical method, his 1766 book, Dreams of a Spirit-Seer ... is examined and found to contain all the essential elements of that method. The onlykey element which is missing is his “Copernican” insight. Although Hume may have played an important role in the early 1760’s in awakening Kant to the importance of his Critical method, this Copernican insight seems to have its roots more in Swedenborg than in Hume. Moreover, [DREAMS] itself should no longer be interpreted as evincing a sceptical or empirical stage in Kant’s development, but can now be seen as setting for Kant the problem which his Critical System was intended to solve. [DREAMS] suggests the two strands of this problem: (1) How is mystical experience possible? and (2) How is metaphysics possible? [DREAMS] offers a Critical answer to the first question, but does not fully develop its implications|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Graham Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel I: In the Kantian Wake. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):385-397.
Coleen P. Zoller (2007). The Pre-Critical Roots of Kant's Compatibilism. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):197-213.
Thomas Sturm (2004). Manfred Kuehn: Kant - A Biography. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 54:476-479.
Brigitte Sassen (ed.) (2000). Kant's Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Alison Ross (2000). Introduction to Monique David -Ménard on Kant and Madness. Hypatia 15 (4):77-81.
Harold W. Brogan (2004). Kant's Retrieval of Leibniz. Epoché 8 (2):271-284.
Brian Chance (2011). Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume. Kantian Review 16 (3):325-349.
Ty D. Camp, From the Schematic to the Symbolic: The Radical Possibilities of the Imagination in Kant's Third Critique.
Rebecca Kukla (ed.) (2006). Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Anja Jauernig (2008). Kant's Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but Pro Leibniz. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1998). ‘Buchdahl’s “Phenomenological” View of Kant: A Critique’. Kant-Studien 89:335-352.
Thomas A. Russman (2002). Palmquist, Stephen R. Kant's Critical Religion: Volume Two of Kant's System of Perspectives. The Review of Metaphysics 56 (1):197-198.
Jill Vance Buroker (2006). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Forster (2009). Kant and Skepticism. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #154,860 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?