David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 36 (1):17-28 (2008)
Although Kant is often interpreted as an Enlightenment Deist, Kant scholars are increasingly recognizing aspects of his philosophy that are more amenable to theism. If Kant regarded himself as a theist, what kind of theist was he? The theological approach that best fits Kant’s model of God is panentheism, whereby God is viewed as a living being pervading the entire natural world, present ‘in’ every part of nature, yet going beyond the physical world. The purpose of Kant’s restrictions on our knowledge of God is not to cast doubt on God’s existence, but to preserve a mystery in God’s reality so that God is always more than the world as we experience it. The same God who is theoretically unknowable is also an aspect of the moral substratum of the physical world. Kant’s moral Trinity (God as righteous Lawgiver, benevolent Ruler, and just Judge) permeates everything, as the ultimate unifier of reason and nature. This Paper was delivered during the 2007 APA Pacific Mini-Conference on Models of God, together with papers published in Philosophia 35:3–4.
|Keywords||Immanuel Kant Panentheism Philosophy of Religion Models of God|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Benedikt Paul Göcke (2013). On the Importance of Karl Christian Friedrich Krause's Panentheism. Zygon 48 (2):364-379.
Benedikt Paul Göcke (2015). There is No Panentheistic Paradigm. Heythrop Journal 57 (6).
Margit Ruffing (2010). Kant-Bibliographie 2008. Kant-Studien 101 (4):487-538.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Pasternack (2012). Kant on the Debt of Sin. Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):30-52.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2005). Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant (1909). Critique of Practical Reason. Dover Publications.
Donald Wayne Viney (2007). Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism and the Mystery of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):341-350.
Ellen Stansell (2010). Suturing the Body Corporate (Divine and Human) in the Brahmanic Traditions. Sophia 49 (2):237-259.
Derk Pereboom (1996). Kant on God, Evil, and Teleology. Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):508-533.
Robert Merrihew Adams (2000). God, Possibility, and Kant. Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):425-440.
James E. Taylor (2007). Response to Ted Peters' “Models of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):289-292.
Ted Peters (2007). Models of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Stephen R. Palmquist (2009). Kant's Religious Argument for the Existence of God. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):3-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads114 ( #36,638 of 1,939,000 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #45,664 of 1,939,000 )
How can I increase my downloads?