David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2009)
John Palmer develops and defends a modal interpretation of Parmenides, according to which he was the first philosopher to distinguish in a rigorous manner the fundamental modalities of necessary being, necessary non-being or impossibility, and non-necessary or contingent being. This book accordingly reconsiders his place in the historical development of Presocratic philosophy in light of this new interpretation. Careful treatment of Parmenides' specification of the ways of inquiry that define his metaphysical and epistemological outlook paves the way for detailed analyses of his arguments demonstrating the temporal and spatial attributes of what is and cannot not be. Since the existence of this necessary being does not preclude the existence of other entities that are but need not be, Parmenides' cosmology can straightforwardly be taken as his account of the origin and operation of the world's mutable entities. Later chapters reassess the major Presocratics' relation to Parmenides in light of the modal interpretation, focusing particularly on Zeno, Melissus, Anaxagoras, and Empedocles. In the end, Parmenides' distinction among the principal modes of being, and his arguments regarding what what must be must be like, simply in virtue of its mode of being, entitle him to be seen as the founder of metaphysics or ontology as a domain of inquiry distinct from natural philosophy and theology. An appendix presents a Greek text of the fragments of Parmenides' poem with English translation and textual notes
|Keywords||Eleatics Pre-Socratic philosophers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$50.40 used (58% off) $112.48 new (7% off) $120.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B235.P24.P35 2009|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Bickhard (2011). Some Consequences (and Enablings) of Process Metaphysics. Axiomathes 21 (1):3-32.
John E. Sisko & Yale Weiss (2015). A Fourth Alternative in Interpreting Parmenides. Phronesis 60 (1):40-59.
Gérard Journée (2012). Lumière et Nuit, Féminin et Masculin chez Parménide d'Elée : quelques remarques. Phronesis 57 (4):289-318.
Similar books and articles
G. B. Kerferd (1966). From Parmenides to Democritus W. K. C. Guthrie: A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. Ii: The Presocratic Tradition From Parmenides to Democritus. Pp. Xvii+554. Cambridge: University Press, 1965. Cloth, 75s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (03):365-368.
Matthew R. Cosgrove (2012). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):131-132.
John Anderson Palmer (1999). Plato's Reception of Parmenides. Oxford University Press.
Frank A. Lewis (2009). Parmenides' Modal Fallacy. Phronesis 54 (1):1-8.
G. S. Kirk, J. Raven & Malcom Schofield (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge University Press.
John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
A. H. Coxon (1999). The Philosophy of Forms: An Analytical and Historical Commentary on Plato's Parmenides: With a New English Translation. Van Gorcum.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2009). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. The University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-05-19
Total downloads33 ( #115,502 of 1,789,801 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,681 of 1,789,801 )
How can I increase my downloads?