David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 59 (227):39- (1984)
The articles on ‘thinking’ by Gilbert Ryle brought together by Konstantin Kolenda were not very well received, even by those who acknowledge, as awhole generation of philosophers must, a considerable intellectual debt to him. Bernard Williams in his review ‘Ryle Remembered’ ) seemed to capture the general impression created by the book. My suspicion is that this was so because readers approached it with a resistance built up over years of hearingRyle flounder on the topic. They read the book expecting to find nothing init that they had not already assimilated or rejected. To pick up the metaphor G. E. L. Owen employed in the obituary he wrote for the Aristotelian Society, they had come to regard Ryle's work as a philosophical seam which during his own lifetime had already been so extensively and profitably minedthat by the time of his death it was already producing diminishing returns. Although Williams in his review did provide a rationale for Ryle's floundering I suspect that his rationale, like most readers’ expectations, preventedhim from reading the articles in the volume at all closely. Williams's viewwas that towards the end of his life, with whatever he had had in the way of theory collapsing around him, Ryle was left with nothing but his massive common sense together with the resources of a style of writing which had bythen become a caricature of itself. As against this I shall argue that Ryle, puzzled by the notion of thinking, took the problem back to his own philosophical roots where he finally came to think that the solution lay
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eduardo Almeida (1997). Un Analisis de la “Res Cogitans” (an Analysis of “Res Cogitans”). Theoria 12 (2):281-292.
Paul Bourgine (1989). Homo Oeconomicus is Also Homo Cogitans Homo Cogitans is Also Homo Oeconomicus. Theory and Decision 27 (1-2):1-6.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2007). GILBERRT RYLE ON DESCARTES' MYTH. K.U. Research Journal of Arts and Humanities (Jan.-Dec.2007):81-86.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2010). Ryle’s Dispositional Analysis of Mind and its Relevance. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences (April, 2010):103-112.
Christopher Winch (2009). Ryle on Knowing How and the Possibility of Vocational Education. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):88-101.
Robert Norman (1970). Ryle on 'the Problem of the Self'. Philosophical Studies 19:220-235.
Elmer Sprahue (1973). Ryle's Myth. Personalist 54 (1):34-41.
Gilbert Ryle (1958). Letters de M. Ryle. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 63 (1):126 - 127.
S. Park (1994). Reinterpreting Ryle: A Nonbehaviorist Analysis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):265-90.
John K. O.’Connor (2012). Category Mistakes and Logical Grammar: Ryle's Husserlian Tutelage. Symposium 16 (2):235-250.
M. Weitz (1951). Professor Ryle's "Logical Behaviourism". Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):297-300.
Greg Sax (2010). Having Know-How: Intellect, Action, and Recent Work on Ryle's Distinction Between Knowledge-How and Knowledge-That. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):507-530.
G. Ryle (1931). Mr. Ryle on Propositions: Rejoinder. Mind 40 (159):330-334.
G. Ryle (1931). Discussion: Mr. Ryle on Propositions. Mind 40 (159):330-334.
Arnold Cusmariu (1980). Ryle's Paradox and the Concept of Exemplification. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):65-71.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #483,347 of 1,790,148 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #426,070 of 1,790,148 )
How can I increase my downloads?