Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):97 – 107 (2004)
|Abstract||This paper explores the idea of 'respect for nature' in the Earth Charter. It maintains that the Earth Charter proposes a broadly holistic environmental ethic where, in situations of conflict, species are given ethical priority over the lives of individual sentient organisms. The paper considers policy implications of this perspective, looking by means of example at the current European environmental policy dispute about the ruddy and white-headed duck. Questions about the value of species and biological diversity this raises are explored. The paper concludes that the principle of valuing individual animal lives should be given more prominence in Earth Charter principles.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kent E. Holsinger (1984). The Nature of Biological Species. Philosophy of Science 51 (2):293-307.
David Schmidtz (2011). Respect for Everything. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):127 - 138.
Jeremy Bendik-Keymer (2003). The Idea of an Ecological Orientation. Social Philosophy Today 19:55-63.
Nicholas Agar (1995). Valuing Species and Valuing Individuals. Environmental Ethics 17 (4):397-415.
Gene Spitler (1982). Justifying a Respect for Nature. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):255-260.
Robin Attfield (2007). Beyond the Earth Charter. Environmental Ethics 29 (4):359-367.
Nigel Dower (2005). The Nature and Scope of Global Ethics and the Relevance of the Earth Charter. Journal of Global Ethics 1 (1):25 – 43.
Sherilyn MacGregor (2004). Reading the Earth Charter: Cosmopolitan Environmental Citizenship or Light Green Politics as Usual? Ethics, Place and Environment 7 (1 & 2):85 – 96.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #71,160 of 549,130 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,130 )
How can I increase my downloads?