Securing privacy at work: The importance of contextualized consent [Book Review]

Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The starting point of this article is that employees’ chances of securing reasonable expectations of privacy at work must be better protected. A dependency asymmetry between employer and job-applicant implies that prospective employees are in a disadvantaged position vis à vis the employer regarding the chances of defending their reasonable interests. Since an increased usage of work related surveillance will, to a larger extent, require of job-applicants that they negotiate their privacy interests in employment contracting, it is important to consider means of strengthening employees’ negotiating power. This article emphasizes the importance of contextualizing consent for contractual agreements to be ethically acceptable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-07

Downloads
73 (#217,217)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elin Palm
Linkoping University

Citations of this work

Codes of ethics in the light of fairness and harm.Dan Munter - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (2):174-188.
An interactive ethical assessment of surveillance‐capable software within the home‐help service sector.Elin Palm - 2013 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (1):43-68.
Pluralism about the Value of Privacy.William Bülow - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 16:12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references