David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kant's Critical philosophy is notorious for its terminological ambiguity and apparent inconsistency. The interpretive confusion that often results is at least a contributing factor to the conclusion of many commentators, such as Strawson, that large chunks of Kant's System (e.g., his 'transcendental idealism') are 'unintelligible' and 'incoherent'.  Yet I believe, with Kant [Kt1: Axxi], that if his works are approached with 'the patience and impartiality of a judge' (and perhaps even with 'the benevolent assistance of a fellow worker '), rather than with a set of analytical tools with which to dissect his every sentence, then almost all of his theories can be understood in surprisingly simple and consistent terms. Accordingly, I shall make a further step in this chapter towards the substantiation of this supposition by interpreting and interrelating some of the fundamental epistemological distinctions which serve to structure all three Critiques
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Palmquist (1989). Immanuel Kant: A Christian Philosopher? Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):65-75.
Stephen Palmquist (1986). The Architectonic Form of Kant's Copernican Logic. Metaphilosophy 17 (4):266-288.
Thomas A. Russman (2002). Palmquist, Stephen R. Kant's Critical Religion: Volume Two of Kant's System of Perspectives. Review of Metaphysics 56 (1):197-198.
Stephen R. Palmquist (2012). To Tell the Truth on Kant and Christianity. Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):340-346.
Jennifer Mensch (2011). Intuition and Nature in Kant and Goethe. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):431-453.
Stephen R. Palmquist (1989). Kant's Critique of Mysticism. Philosophy and Theology 3 (4):355-383.
Allen Hance (1998). The Art of Nature: Hegel and the Critique of Judgment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):37 – 65.
Peter Graham Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel I: In the Kantian Wake. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):385-397.
Alberto Vanzo (2013). Kant on Empiricism and Rationalism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (1):53-74.
Elena Ficara (2009). »Transzendental« bei Kant und Fichte. Fichte-Studien 33:81-95.
Susan A. J. Stuart (2003). A Metaphysical Approach to the Mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (3):223-37.
Sebastian Gardner (2011). Kant's Practical Postulates and the Limits of the Critical System. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63:187 - 215.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1998). ‘Buchdahl’s “Phenomenological” View of Kant: A Critique’. Kant-Studien 89:335-352.
Added to index2011-01-06
Total downloads17 ( #94,143 of 1,096,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,368 of 1,096,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?