Critical Review 12 (3):337-358 (1998)
|Abstract||Abstract In his critique of modern libertarian thinking, Jeffrey Friedman (1997) argues that libertarian moral theory makes social science irrelevant. However, if its moral claims are hypothetical rather than categorical imperatives, then economics, history, sociology, and other disciplines play a central role in libertarian thought. Limitations on human knowledge necessitate abstractly formulated rules, among which are claims of rights. Further, Friedman's remarks on freedom rest on an erroneous understanding of the role of definitions in philosophy, and his characterization of the ?right to do wrong? as a ?logical contradiction? reveals a misunderstanding of logic.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David L. Brooks (1994). The Problems of Postlibertarianism: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 8 (1):85-94.
Antony Flew (1992). Dissent From “the New Consensus”: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 6 (1):83-96.
Jeffrey Friedman (1997). What's Wrong with Libertarianism. Critical Review 11 (3):407-467.
Jeffrey Friedman (1998). The Libertarian Straddle: Rejoinder to Palmer and Sciabarra. Critical Review 12 (3):359-388.
Jan Narveson (1992). Libertarianism, Postlibertarianism, and the Welfare State: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 6 (1):45-82.
W. William Woolsey (1994). Libertarianisms: Mainstream, Radical, and Post. Critical Review 8 (1):73-84.
Chris Matthew Sciabarra (1998). Are We All Dialecticians Now? Reply to MacGregor and Friedman. Critical Review 12 (3):283-299.
Am Feallsanach (1998). Locke and Libertarian Property Rights: Reply to Weinberg. Critical Review 12 (3):319-323.
Adrian Bardon (2000). From Nozick to Welfare Rights: Self‐Ownership, Property, and Moral Desert. Critical Review 14 (4):481-501.
Richard J. Ellis (1993). The Case for Cultural Theory: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 7 (1):81-128.
Jeffrey Friedman (1992). After Libertarianism: Rejoinder to Narveson, McCloskey, Flew, and Machan. Critical Review 6 (1):113-152.
Nathaniel Jason Goldberg (2009). Historicism, Entrenchment, and Conventionalism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (2).
Gerald K. Harrison (2006). The Case for Hyper-Libertarianism. Kriterion 20 (1):1-6.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?