Against causal descriptivism
Mind and Society 5 (1):78-84 (2006)
| Abstract | Causal descriptivism and its relative nominal descriptivism are critically examined. It is argued that they do not manage to undermine the principal conclusions of the new theory of reference | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrank Jackson (2001). Locke-Ing Onto Content. In D. Walsh (ed.), Evolution, Naturalism and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Bryan Pickel (2012). Rigidification and Attitudes. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):43-58.
Ishani Maitra, Brian Weatherson & Jonathan Ichikawa (forthcoming). In Defense of a Kripkean Dogma. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Frederick W. Kroon (1987). Causal Descriptivism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):1 – 17.
Robin Jeshion (2002). The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325 - 345.
Jeff Speaks (2010). Epistemic Two-Dimensionalism and the Epistemic Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78.
Robin Jeshion (2002). The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325-345.
Ben Caplan (2007). Millian Descriptivism. Philosophical Studies 133 (2):181-198.
David Braddon-Mitchell (2004). Masters of Our Meanings. Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):133-52.
Philip Pettit (2004). Descriptivism, Rigidified and Anchored. Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):323-338.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads14 ( #83,218 of 549,715 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,715 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
