David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):1-20 (2012)
Despite the variety of competing interpretations of domination, a common feature of the most influential analyses of the concept is their reliance on a normative criterion: the detrimental effect of domination on those subject to it. This article offers a non-evaluative, non-consequence-based definition of domination, in line with the perspective on power developed by the theory of the social exchange. Domination, it is argued, should be seen as a structural property of a power relation, and consists in an extreme inequality in the social distribution of power. It is contended, accordingly, that the postulation of a society in which domination is avoided (or minimized) should rely on the ideal of the minimization of inequality, and, more specifically, that it should be based on a distributional pattern of maximally equal social resources
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Pettit (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press.
Ian Carter (2008). How Are Power and Unfreedom Related. In Cécile Laborde & John W. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory. Blackwell 58--82.
Steven Lukes & Jack H. Nagel (1976). Power: A Radical View. Political Theory 4 (2):246-249.
Peter Morriss (2002). Power: A Philosophical Analysis. Manchester University Press.
Matthew Kramer (2008). Liberty and Domination. In Cécile Laborde & John W. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory. Blackwell 31--57.
Citations of this work BETA
Andreas Busen (2015). Non-Domination, Non-Normativity and Neo-Republican Politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (4):407-423.
Similar books and articles
Chris Armbruster, Theory of Domination: Legitimacy, Authority, Hierarchy - Theorie der Herrschaft: Legitimität, Autorität, Hierarchie.
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Republicanism and Democratic Injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
Amy Allen (1998). Power Trouble: Performativity as Critical Theory. Constellations 5 (4):456-471.
Mark Rigstad (2011). Republicanism and Geopolitical Domination. Journal of Political Power 4 (2):279-300.
Alan M. S. J. Coffee (2012). Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135.
Sharon Bishop (2002). Amy Allen, The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity:The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Ethics 112 (3):587-589.
M. J. Thompson (2013). Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):277-298.
Mark Haugaard (2010). Power and Social Criticism: Reflections on Power, Domination and Legitimacy. Critical Horizons 11 (1):51-74.
Ciaran Cronin (1996). Bourdieu and Foucault on Power and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Elizabeth A. Armstrong & Mary Bernstein (2008). Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. Sociological Theory 26 (1):74 - 99.
Lena Halldenius (1998). Non-Domination and Egalitarian Welfare Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):335-353.
Douglas Kellner (1993). Bartky, Domination, and the Subject. Hypatia 8 (1):145 - 152.
Added to index2012-06-29
Total downloads47 ( #101,323 of 1,941,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #334,045 of 1,941,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?