David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):597-630 (2002)
This paper presents a comprehensive study of Robert Boyle’s writings on seminal principles or seeds. It examines the role of seeds in Boyle’s account of creation, the generation of plants and animals, spontaneous generation, the generation of minerals and disease. By an examination of all of Boyle’s major extant discussions of seeds it is argued that there were discernible changes in Boyle’s views over time. As the years progressed Boyle became more sceptical about the role of seminal principles in the generation of minerals and he came to reject the spontaneous generation of insects and animals from putrefying matter. It is also argued that Boyle’s notion of a generative or ‘plastick’ principle creates a tension within his mechanical philosophy. He appeals to a plastick power in order to explain those phenomena of generation that are beyond the explanatory resources of the corpuscular hypothesis. However, when pressed to explain the nature of this power he either hints, somewhat paradoxically, that it too can be explained mechanically or admits his nescience
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Antonio Clericuzio (1990). A Redefinition of Boyle's Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy. Annals of Science 47 (6):561-589.
Daniel C. Fouke (1989). Mechanical and “Organical” Models in Seventeenth-Century Explanations of Biological Reproduction. Science in Context 3 (2).
Pierre Gassendi (1658). Opera Omnia. Anisson.
Guido Giglioni (1995). Automata Compared Boyle, Leibniz and the Debate on the Notion of Life and M. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):249 – 278.
Joseph Glanvill (1665/1978). Scepsis Scientifica. Garland Pub..
Citations of this work BETA
Laurence Carlin (2012). Boyle's Teleological Mechanism and the Myth of Immanent Teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):54-63.
Similar books and articles
R. P. (2002). Boyle on Seminal Principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):597-630.
Simon B. Duffy (2008). Review of Michael Hunter, The Boyle Papers: Understanding the Manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Ashgate, 2007). [REVIEW] Reviews in the Enlightenment 1.
J. J. MacIntosh (2005). Robert Boyle (1627–1691): Scrupulosity and Science Michael Hunter Woodbridge, UK: Boydell, 2000, Ix + 293 Pp., $90.00The Philosophy of Robert Boyle Peter R. Anstey Routledge Studies in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy New York: Routledge, 2000, Xv + 231 Pp., $90.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 44 (01):167-.
J. J. MacIntosh (1992). Robert Boyle's Epistemology: The Interaction Between Scientific and Religious Knowledge. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121.
Jan-Erik Jones (2007). Locke Vs. Boyle: The Real Essence of Corpuscular Species. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):659 – 684.
Jan-Erik Jones (2005). Boyle, Classification and the Workmanship of the Understanding Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Thomas Holden (2007). Robert Boyle on Things Above Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):283 – 312.
Peter Anstey (1999). Boyle on Occasionalism: An Unexamined Source. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (1):57-81.
Joseph M. Boyle Jr (1984). Aquinas, Kant, and Donagan on Moral Principles. New Scholasticism 58 (4):391-408.
Peter R. Anstey (2002). Robert Boyle and the Heuristic Value of Mechanism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):157-170.
Alberto Vanzo (2012). Kant on Experiment. In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor. Springer 75-96.
Laura Keating (1993). Un-Locke-Ing Boyle: Boyle on Primary and Secondary Qualities. History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (4):305 - 323.
Rose‐Mary Sargent (2004). Robert Boyle and the Masculine Methods of Science. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):857-867.
Rose-Mary Sargent (2004). Robert Boyle and the Masculine Methods of Science. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):857-867.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,240 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,240 )
How can I increase my downloads?