Synthese 67 (2):259 - 271 (1986)
|Abstract||The axioms adopted by Packard (1981) and Heiner and Packard (1983) for plausibility ranking of sets of statements are critically examined. It is shown that the informational requirement of the Heiner-Packard (1983) framework is much stronger than Packard's (1981) framework and hence both axiomatic setups are examined separately. A characterization of the leximin rule is provided in Packard's framework and the nonintuitive implications of the Heiner-Packard (1983) axioms are discussed. It is also demonstrated that in both frameworks, minor variations of some of the axioms convert the characterization results into logical impossibilities.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dennis Packard (1998). A Willingness to Reason and Write. Inquiry 17 (4):31-39.
M. Carmen Sánchez (1998). Rational Choice on Non-Finite Sets by Means of Expansion-Contraction Axioms. Theory and Decision 45 (1):1-17.
Emil Weydert (2012). Conditional Ranking Revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):237-271.
Marc Pauly (2008). On the Role of Language in Social Choice Theory. Synthese 163 (2):227 - 243.
A. I. Dale (1980). Probability, Vague Statements and Fuzzy Sets. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):38-55.
Dennis J. Packard (1981). Plausibility Orderings and Social Choice. Synthese 49 (3):415 - 418.
Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (1998). On Preference and Freedom. Theory and Decision 44 (2):173-198.
Ronald A. Heiner & Dennis J. Packard (1983). More About Plausibility Orderings. Synthese 55 (3):333 - 337.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?