David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):327-357 (2005)
Tarski, Carnap and Quine spent the academic year 1940?1941 together at Harvard. In their autobiographies, both Carnap and Quine highlight the importance of the conversations that took place among them during the year. These conversations centred around semantical issues related to the analytic/synthetic distinction and on the project of a finitist/nominalist construction of mathematics and science. Carnap's Nachlaß in Pittsburgh contains a set of detailed notes, amounting to more than 80 typescripted pages, taken by Carnap while these discussions were taking place. In my article, I present a survey of these notes with special emphasis on Tarski's rejection of the analytic/synthetic distinction, the passage from typed languages to first-order languages, Tarski's finitism/nominalism, and the construction of a finitist language for mathematics and science
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Carnap (1936). Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
John Corcoran & Alfred Tarski (1986). What Are Logical Notions? History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (2):143-154.
Leonard Linsky (1970). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ethics 80 (4):322-323.
Nelson Goodman & W. V. Quine (1947). Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (4):105-122.
Paolo Mancosu (2001). Mathematical Explanation: Problems and Prospects. Topoi 20 (1):97-117.
Citations of this work BETA
Rafal Urbaniak (2012). Numbers and Propositions Versus Nominalists: Yellow Cards for Salmon & Soames. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 77 (3):381-397.
Gary Ebbs (2014). Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science. History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (2):181-188.
Greg Frost-Arnold (2011). Quine’s Evolution From ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of “Two Dogmas. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):291-316.
Gary Ebbs (2014). Can First-Order Logical Truth Be Defined in Purely Extensional Terms? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):343-367.
Jan Woleński (2013). Handbook of the History of Logic: Vol. 5, Logic From Russell to Church. History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (1):1-6.
Similar books and articles
William H. Berge (1995). Carnap and Translational Indeterminacy. Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121.
Eric J. Loomis (2006). Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Paul Gregory (2003). Putting the Bite Back Into. Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Alexander George (2000). On Washing the Fur Without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity. Mind 109 (433):1-24.
Marian David (1996). Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth. Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
Stephen Yablo (1998). Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):229 - 283.
John P. Burgess (2004). Quine, Analyticity and Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):38–55.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads31 ( #102,719 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?