Indefinite propositions and anaphora in Stoic logic
Phronesis 39 (2):187-206 (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Dekker (2002). Meaning and Use of Indefinite Expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):141-194.
Peter Mittelstaedt (1978). The Metalogic of Quantum Logic. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.
Michael Rieppel (2011). Stoic Disagreement and Belief Retention. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):243-262.
Susanne Bobzien (2011). The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40 (1):157-188.
G. F. Liddell (1982). A Logic for Propositions with Indefinite Truth Values. Studia Logica 41 (2-3):197 - 226.
Paolo Crivelli (1994). The Stoic Analysis of Tense and of Plural Propositions in Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathemticos. Classical Quarterly 44 (02):490-499.
Michael B. Papazian (2001). Chrysippus and the Destruction of Propositions: A Defence of the Standard Interpretation. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):1-12.
Paolo Crivelli (1994). Indefinite Propositions and Anaphora in Stoic Logic. Phronesis 39 (2):187-206.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
