David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 40 (4):841-855 (2012)
Two questions have been discussed within the context of the action individuation debate. First, the question of action individuation proper - how many actions have been performed when one kills someone by shooting, for example. Second, the question of action externalization - what are the spatial and temporal boundaries of the killing and of the shooting. The internalists (Davidson, Hornsby) argue that the boundaries of actions do not reach beyond the skin of the individual. The externalists (e.g. Ginet) argue that the boundaries of actions do extend beyond the individual. The main problem for the externalists is to explain why so conceived actions are actions. In the paper I evaluate Ginet’s response to this question but find it ultimately unsatisfactory
|Keywords||Action theory Action individuation Temporal problem Action internalism Action externalism Ginet|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. E. M. Anscombe (1979). Under a Description. Noûs 13 (2):219-233.
Kent Bach (1980). Actions Are Not Events. Mind 89 (353):114-120.
Annette C. Baier (1972). Ways and Means. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):275 - 293.
Jonathan Bennett (1973). Shooting, Killing and Dying. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):315 - 323.
Michael E. Bratman (2006). What is the Accordion Effect? Journal of Ethics 10 (1-2):5 - 19.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Beverly K. Hinton (2001). A Critique of Carl Ginet's Intrinsic Theory of Volition. Behavior and Philosophy 29:101 - 120.
Carl Ginet (1990). On Action. Cambridge University Press.
Randolph Clarke (2010). Because She Wanted To. Journal of Ethics 14 (1):27--35.
Stewart C. Goetz (1998). Failed Solutions to a Standard Libertarian Problem. Philosophical Studies 90 (3):237-244.
Sara Rachel Chant (2007). Unintentional Collective Action. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):245 – 256.
Carl Ginet (2002). Reasons Explanations of Action: Causalist Versus Noncausalist Accounts. In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on Free Will. Oxford University Press. 386-405.
Carl Ginet (2007). An Action Can Be Both Uncaused and Up to the Agent. In Lumer (ed.), Intentionality, Deliberation, and Autonomy. Ashgate. 243--255.
Alfred Mele (1992). On Action, by Carl Ginet. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (2):488-491.
Carl Ginet (1989). Reasons Explanation of Action: An Incompatibilist Account. Philosophical Perspectives 3:17-46.
Carl Ginet & Sally McConnell-Ginet (1976). Book Review. Res Cogitans. Zeno Vendler. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 85 (2):216-224.
Carl Ginet (1995). Reason's Explanation of Action. In Timothy O'Connor (ed.), Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford University Press.
Anfinn Stigen (1970). The Concept of a Human Action. Inquiry 13 (1-4):1 – 31.
Carl Ginet (2005). Infinitism is Not the Answer to the Regress Problem. In Matthias Steup & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell.
Andrew Naylor (2012). Belief From the Past. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):598-620.
Added to index2012-11-25
Total downloads6 ( #230,243 of 1,410,149 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,149 )
How can I increase my downloads?