David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We are all physicalists now. It was not always so. A hundred years ago most educated thinkers had no doubt that non-physical processes occurred within living bodies and intelligent minds. Nor was this an anti-scientific stance: the point would have been happily agreed by most practicing scientists of the time. Yet nowadays anybody who says that minds and bodies involve non-physical processes is regarded as a crank. This is a profound intellectual shift. In this essay I want to explore its methodological implications for the human sciences. I do not think that these have been adequately appreciated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald C. Hodges (1965). Minding, Minds and Bodies. Pacific Philosophy Forum 3 (February):74-86.
Susanne Mrozik (2007). Virtuous Bodies: The Physical Dimensions of Morality in Buddhist Ethics. Oxford University Press.
David B. Kitts (1983). The Complexity of Living Bodies and the Structure of Biological Theories. Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3):195-205.
Thomas Wynn (2002). Archaeology and Cognitive Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):389-402.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads12 ( #145,030 of 1,410,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?